Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Catholicism(s) And The US Election

As a Canadian following the US election season with great interest, I can't help but notice that one essential difference between our two countries is that God and religion is virtually absent from our politics, but prominent in theirs. One characterization that Canadians might be excused for buying into is that the Republicans are the religion party, particularly of an evangelical-centric, exceptionalist type of Christianity, while the Democrats are predominantly secular.

Molly Worthen, a professor of history at UNC, Chapel Hill, writing today in the NYT, reminds us that the real story is (surprise!) more complicated. This election Worthen rights, is a tale of two Americas but also is "a tale of two Catholicisms". Her call on the Democrats not to ignore the tradition of liberal Catholicism is also a reminder that religion, even in politics, has the potential "to address the basic questions of the human predicament."

1 comment:

Bernard said...

Canada has become so religion blind that most people have no idea two very prominent premiers were Jewish.

From 1968 to 2006 all the Canadian PMs were Catholics other than Kim Campbell, she is as close to an atheist that we have had.

People in Canada also tend to forget that they left in Canada very much brought into existence by clergymen.

Another important difference between Canada and the US is how much personal lives are part of politics. In the US the wife of the candidate gets a lot of media, in Canada very little and virtually none outside of elections. People may sort of know about Loraine Harper, but what about Mulcair's partner?

You are in Alberta, what do you know of your premier's religion or partner?

Mad Padre

Mad Padre
Opinions expressed within are in no way the responsibility of anyone's employers or facilitating agencies and should by rights be taken as nothing more than one person's notional musings, attempted witticisms, and prayerful posturings.

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels